Review group name (essential 🟢)

Description/Meaning

The name of the community or organisation that is submitting the review to metadata services and responsible for updating the metadata records. Not the authors of the review.

🤖Examples

code example of fields the metadata can be mapped to and how to retrieve an example

Crossref

Deposit

<institution>Review group name</institution>

See Peer reviews markup guide

Retrieval

{"institution":[
{
"name":"Review Commons"
}
]

DataCite

Deposit Retrieval

<publisher xml:lang="en" publisherIdentifier="https://ror.org/04z8jg394" publisherIdentifierScheme="ROR" schemeURI="https://ror.org/">Helmholtz Centre Potsdam - GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences</publisher>
Definition: The name of the entity that holds, archives, publishes, prints, distributes, releases, issues, or produces the resource. This property will be used to formulate the citation, so consider the prominence of the role. 

DocMaps

A field “name” on the input of the first step (see full examples).

{
  ...
  "steps": {    "_:b0": {      "inputs": [{
        "publisher": "name":,
        ...
     }]
    }
  }
}

🙏Who is currently depositing/retrieving this metadata and can help others?

Organisation and contact email	Workflow example
eLife Sciences Publications,	6. Publish-Review-Curate platform
PREreview	4. Preprint review platform using a repository
Sciety
Review Commons
F1000, michael.evans@f1000.com	5. Open Research platform

💪Actions/updates from the community

The comments section provides a way for the preprint review community to discuss approaches to implementation of the metadata. Here you can show how you are depositing and using the metadata and provide updates.