PID of preprint reviewed (essential 🟢)

Description/Meaning

The persistent identifier of the preprint eg. (doi.org) formatted as `https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.28.24303482`

🤖Examples

code example of fields the metadata can be mapped to and how to retrieve an example

Crossref

Deposit

<inter_work_relation relationship-type="isReviewOf" identifier-type="doi">10.1186/s12895-016-0051-4</inter_work_relation>

See Peer reviews markup guide

Retrieval
{'is-review-of': [
{'asserted-by': 'subject',
'id': '10.7554/eLife.91327.4',
'id-type': 'doi'
}
]}

DataCite

Deposit


| relatedIdentifiers: \[{relationType: "Reviews",relatedIdentifier: "10.12688/verixiv.77.3",relatedIdentifierType: "DOI"}\], |
| :---- |

Retrieval


https://api.datacite.org/dois/10.21956/verixiv.511.r193

JSON:

relatedIdentifiers: [
{
relationType: "Reviews",
relatedIdentifier: "10.12688/verixiv.77.3",
relatedIdentifierType: "DOI"
}
],

XML:

<relatedIdentifiers>
    <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="DOI" relationType="Reviews">10.12688/verixiv.77.3</relatedIdentifier>
  </relatedIdentifiers>

DocMaps

A field “doi” on the input of the first step (see full example).

{
  ...
  "steps": {    "_:b0": {      "inputs": [{
        "type": "preprint",
        "doi": "10.1101/2022.05.16.492226",
        ...
     }
    }
  }}

🙏Who is currently depositing/retrieving this metadata and can help others?

💪Actions/updates from the community

The comments section provides a way for the preprint review community to discuss approaches to implementation of the metadata. Here you can show how you are depositing and using the metadata and provide updates.